Hey there K-pop fans! ๐ Have you caught wind of the latest drama surrounding our favorite rookie sensation NewJeans? The plot just thickened in their ongoing contract dispute with ADOR, and it's getting more complicated than a K-drama finale! ๐ฟ
Table of Contents
The Background: How Did We Get Here? ๐
The NewJeans (NJZ) and ADOR contract dispute has been ongoing since April 2024, originating from tensions between HYBE (ADOR's parent company) and former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin. The situation escalated dramatically when NewJeans members claimed their exclusive contracts were terminated on November 29, 2024, citing ADOR's alleged failure to fulfill contractual obligations. ๐ฎ
Since January 31, 2025, the parents of NewJeans members have taken a more active role in the dispute, even creating social media accounts to publicly represent the group's position. Until recently, they appeared to present a united front against ADOR, consistently arguing that the agency failed to uphold its contractual duties. ๐ฑ
The Parent Division: Family Split ๐จ๐ฉ๐ง
In a shocking twist that nobody saw coming (well, except maybe K-drama writers ๐ ), reports from April 4, 2025, reveal that the parents of one NewJeans member are now at odds regarding the contract termination! This marks the first confirmed division among the parents since the dispute began.
The disagreement involves the parents of one of the group's two minor members - either Haerin or Hyein. While one parent supports the contract termination (like the parents of other members), the other parent opposes it. Talk about family drama! ๐ฑ
This split is particularly significant because, in legal matters involving minors, both parents typically need to jointly represent their child's interests. The lack of agreement between these parents has now created additional legal complications in an already complex case.
Legal Complications: Minors in the Spotlight โ๏ธ
The legal implications of this parental disagreement are substantial. For minors like Haerin and Hyein, parental consent is crucial for legal proceedings. When parents don't agree, it creates what the court refers to as a "flaw in the litigation agent's authority." ๐งฉ
This issue first surfaced during a hearing on March 7, 2025, when the court noted concerns about the validity of the power of attorney. The legal representatives of NewJeans indicated that a family court hearing had taken place to resolve the guardianship issue, with an expected resolution within a week.
However, as of the April 3rd hearing, the court noted that "there have been no corrections to the flaws," suggesting that the parents still hadn't reached an agreement on how to proceed with the contract termination case. ๐
Recent Court Proceedings: What Happened? ๐๏ธ
On April 3, 2025, the Seoul Central District Court held the first hearing for the 'confirmation of the validity of the exclusive contract' case. During this session, the judge specifically asked NewJeans' representatives about the family court's decision regarding parental rights.
The court's inquiry - "Is this a statement that has approved all litigation activities since the family court's decision on guardianship has been made?" - suggests that legal steps had been taken to address the parental disagreement. ๐ค
Despite these challenges, reports indicate that the April 3rd proceedings suggested the parent who opposed the lawsuit had limited influence, and the case would proceed in alignment with the parent who supported the contract termination. This suggests that one parent's authority may have been given precedence in this particular legal matter.
Future Implications: What's Next for NewJeans? ๐ฎ
This new development adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious dispute. With the court previously accepting ADOR's injunction to stop NewJeans' activities on March 21, 2025, and now this revelation of parental disagreement, the future direction of the case becomes even more uncertain. ๐ช๏ธ
Legal experts suggest that this parental division could potentially influence how the court views the overall case. The fact that not all parents are in agreement about terminating the contract with ADOR might impact the court's perception of the validity of the termination claims.
For NewJeans members themselves, especially the minors involved, this situation must be incredibly challenging. Being caught between not just their agency and their career aspirations, but now potentially between their own parents' differing opinions, adds emotional complexity to an already stressful situation. ๐
Key Takeaways ๐
- Parents of one NewJeans minor member (either Haerin or Hyein) disagree about terminating the contract with ADOR
- This disagreement has created legal complications as minors require joint parental representation
- Despite this division, the court appears to be proceeding with the case based on the supporting parent's position
- This development adds new complexity to the ongoing dispute between NewJeans and ADOR
- The outcome could significantly impact the future of one of K-pop's most promising young groups
What do you think about this latest development in the NewJeans saga? Do you think they'll eventually return to ADOR, or is this the beginning of a new chapter for the group? Drop your thoughts in the comments below! And don't forget to share this article with fellow K-pop fans who are following this ongoing drama! ๐๐ฌ